Skip to main content
BiasedDecisions

Bias leaderboard for fast decision models

Change one detail about a person. Watch the answer move.

Would AI identify a different job for the same person if “he” became “she”? Would it remove the same online comment after its author said they were gay? We test AI models by changing one personal detail in a text and asking the same question again.

We compare 3 AI models across 9 characteristics, including gender, race and age. The results show when their answers depend on a personal detail instead of staying consistent with the rest of the text. Start with a characteristic below, or compare the models. Every result links to the test behind it.

17.85 in 100Laya changed its answer on 17.85 of every 100 paralegal or attorney bios when only a gender detail changed. A harmless edit of the same size, our control edit, changed it on 2.03 in 100. That leaves 15.82 more in every 100, the largest effect we measured anywhere on this site.

Every effect we measured, on one scaleEach mark is one model's largest effect on one characteristic, beyond what the control edit did, shown with its 95% range. Select a characteristic's name for its results, or a mark for that model's details.

Regulated decisions

6 of the 9 characteristics we tested are protected by hiring rules

Laya put 28.9 of every 100 women attorneys on a shortlist of the top 500 of 2,000 bios, against 60.1 of every 100 men. Divide the first rate by the second and you get the shortlist ratio: 0.48. A ratio of 1.0 means women and men make the list at the same rate, and U.S. hiring guidance treats a ratio under 0.80 as a warning sign. The shortlist shows how a model that changes its answers can change who gets picked. Every page about a protected characteristic carries a red warning and a panel on the legal risk.

This is not legal advice. It connects what these models did in our tests to the rules that govern decisions a screening tool might use them for. Whether a real use creates legal liability depends on the facts, the jurisdiction and your lawyers. Each risk below links to the test result behind it, and each rule links to its source.

How the models compare, characteristic by characteristic

Each box is one characteristic. Its number is the model's largest effect there, in percentage points beyond the control edit: darker red is larger. "Worst" marks the model with the largest effect on that characteristic. We do not add the characteristics up into one overall order: they differ in size and design, and not every model was tested on each. Hover or select a box for its range.

  1. Jev
    a clear effect on 9 of the 9 characteristics it was tested on
    largest effect: 13.91 percentage points beyond the control edit
  2. Laya
    a clear effect on 9 of the 9 characteristics it was tested on
    largest effect: 15.82 percentage points beyond the control edit
  3. Kev
    a clear effect on 9 of the 9 characteristics it was tested on
    largest effect: 15.15 percentage points beyond the control edit

The shape of each model's bias

Each spoke is one characteristic. The farther a shape reaches along a spoke, the larger the model's effect there, beyond the control edit. Every model is drawn on the same scale. A bigger shape is a more biased model. A dashed spoke was never tested, and the shape breaks there instead of dropping to zero.

Every characteristic we tested

Gender, by swapping pronouns and on the opioid decision
Regulated decision
Laya 15.82 percentage points

In a biography, we swap the pronouns and a short list of gendered words: he and she, his and her, Mr and Ms, husband and wife. First names were already removed. In a patient's case description, we change the name and pronouns together, from a man to a woman. In a third test we add one sentence, such as "Colleagues describe her as bossy.", to a biography, once for a woman and once for a man.

15 decisions
Race, by name and on the opioid and comment decisions
Regulated decision
Jev 13.78 percentage points

We change a person's name in a biography: a first and last name typical of white, Black, Hispanic or Asian people, or a Black-sounding first name in place of a white-sounding one. In a patient's case description, we change the name and race together. In front of an online comment, we add "As a Black person, " or "As an Asian person, ".

4 groups × 6 decisions
Age, by stated age
Regulated decision
Jev 5.39 percentage points

We add "At 34, " before the first "he" or "she" in the biography, then change it to "At 61, ". On a small-business loan application we put "As a 72-year-old owner, " at the start; on a resume summary, "As a 58-year-old, "; on a real consumer complaint, "As a 78-year-old, ".

4 decisions
Disability, by an added phrase
Regulated decision
Jev 13.91 percentage points

We add "A wheelchair user, " before the first "he" or "she" in the biography. On the opioid and comment decisions, it goes at the start of the text. On a rental inquiry or a resume summary we put "As a wheelchair user, " at the start.

11 decisions
Religion, by an added phrase and by stereotype questions
Regulated decision
Laya 10.92 percentage points

We add a phrase naming a religion, such as "A devout Muslim, ", before the first "he" or "she" in a biography, or "As a Muslim, " in front of an online comment. In a second test we add "A devout Jew, ", "A devout Muslim, ", "A devout Christian, ", "A devout Hindu, " or "A devout Buddhist, " to 2,000 biographies and ask six loaded questions that test for a stereotype. On a rental inquiry or a resume summary we add "As a practising Muslim, " (or Christian, Jew, Hindu) at the start.

5 religions × 16 tests
Nationality, by stereotype questions and on a lending decision
Regulated decision
Jev 9.84 percentage points

We add a nationality to otherwise identical professional biographies and ask six loaded questions that test for a stereotype. In a separate decision test, we add one sentence identifying a small-business-loan principal as American, Chinese, German, Nigerian, Mexican, Indian, British, Israeli, Palestinian, Russian, Ukrainian, South Korean or Japanese.

13 nationalities × 7 tests
Sexuality, by an added phrase
Jev 10.94 percentage points

We put "As a gay person, " or "As a lesbian, " in front of an online comment.

2 groups
Veteran status, by an added phrase
Kev 5.84 percentage points

We put "A veteran of the Iraq war, " or "A veteran of the Navy, " in front of a patient's case description, or "As a veteran of the Iraq war, " or "As a veteran of the Navy, " at the start of a resume summary or a real consumer complaint.

2 groups × 3 decisions
Marital and family status, by an added phrase
Jev 4.20 percentage points

On a rental inquiry or a real consumer complaint we put "As a married person, ", "As a single person, ", "As a divorced person, ", "As a single parent, " or "As a person expecting a baby, " at the start. The rental inquiry was not written with a divorced version.

5 groups × 2 decisions

One more test, and it is not about a kind of person: does listing the answer options in a different order change the answer?

Stereotype tests

We also asked models yes-or-no questions that test for stereotypes, such as whether a person is likely to be dishonest or arrogant. Each time, we added one short phrase to the same short professional biography and compared it with a harmless phrase of the same size. These are tests of the models’ answers, not claims about the people or places named. Where each stereotype comes from.

Nationality stereotypes, thirteen nationalities

Do AI models assume a personality from a nationality?

13 groups × 10 questions · tested on Jev and Laya and Kev
Racial and ethnic stereotypes

Do AI models answer differently about a person’s race or ethnic background?

5 groups × 9 questions · tested on Jev and Laya and Kev
Stereotypes about regions of China

Do AI models judge a person differently by region within China?

4 groups × 8 questions · tested on Jev and Laya and Kev
Stereotypes about groups in India

Do AI models judge a person differently by group within India?

5 groups × 7 questions · tested on Jev and Laya and Kev
Stereotypes about ethnic groups in Nigeria and Kenya

Do AI models judge a person differently by ethnic group in Nigeria and Kenya?

5 groups × 7 questions · tested on Jev and Laya and Kev
Sexual orientation stereotypes

Do AI models judge a person differently by sexual orientation?

4 groups × 6 questions · tested on Jev and Laya and Kev
Family and marital status stereotypes

Do AI models judge a person differently by family situation?

4 groups × 8 questions · tested on Jev and Laya and Kev
Antisemitic stereotypes, six stereotypes, four ways of saying the person is Jewish, and a nationality for comparison

Do AI models treat a Jewish identity as a reason to distrust someone?

5 groups × 6 questions · tested on Jev and Laya and Kev
Antisemitic stereotypes in small-business loan narratives, six stereotypes, four ways of saying the applicant is Jewish, and a nationality for comparison

Do AI models distrust a Jewish loan applicant?

5 groups × 6 questions · tested on Jev and Laya and Kev
Islamophobic stereotypes, six stereotypes, three ways of saying the person is Muslim, and a nationality for comparison

Do AI models treat a Muslim identity as a reason to distrust someone?

4 groups × 6 questions · tested on Jev and Laya and Kev
Islamophobic stereotypes in small-business loan narratives, six stereotypes, three ways of saying the applicant is Muslim, and a nationality for comparison

Do AI models distrust a Muslim loan applicant?

4 groups × 6 questions · tested on Jev and Laya and Kev
Stereotypes documented in Chinese sources: region within china, asked in English and in Chinese

Do AI models judge a person by which region of China they are from?

3 groups × 6 questions · tested on Jev and Laya and Kev
Stereotypes documented in Chinese sources: household registration (hukou), asked in English and in Chinese

Do AI models treat a person’s household registration as a sign of quality or reliability?

3 groups × 4 questions · tested on Jev and Laya and Kev
Stereotypes documented in Chinese sources: ethnic group, asked in English and in Chinese

Do AI models answer differently about a person’s ethnic group in China?

4 groups × 4 questions · tested on Jev and Laya and Kev
Stereotypes documented in Chinese sources: religion, asked in English and in Chinese

Do AI models treat a Muslim identity as a security risk in Chinese-language tests?

4 groups × 2 questions · tested on Jev and Laya and Kev
Stereotypes documented in Chinese sources: university tier, asked in English and in Chinese

Do AI models judge a person by which kind of university they went to?

3 groups × 4 questions · tested on Jev and Laya and Kev

How to read this comparison

For each characteristic, each model's box shows its largest clear effect there, beyond the control edit, and "worst" marks the model with the largest effect on that characteristic. The range for each result is shown when you hover or select its box, and on the characteristic's page.

We do not combine the characteristics into one overall place: they differ in size and design, and a single order would treat a small, uncertain difference the same as a large one. A characteristic a model was never tested on is never counted as zero. The model is marked incomplete instead.

Release v1.49.1, published .

Every number on this site is worked out from the models' saved answers, on 2026-09-30, at version 8b908ef of the public repository, with bd report --json --date 2026-09-30. You can download every number in one data file. About this site.

Where the answers come from: studies/<task>-<cue>.jsonl (re-run from the saved answers with bd replay).

Biased-Decisions is MIT-licensed (source). Bias in Bios (De-Arteaga et al., 2019) is MIT-licensed on the Hugging Face Hub. Typefaces: Jersey 25 and Montserrat, SIL Open Font License.