Bias leaderboard for fast decision models
Change one detail about a person. Watch the answer move.
Would AI identify a different job for the same person if “he” became “she”? Would it remove the same online comment after its author said they were gay? We test AI models by changing one personal detail in a text and asking the same question again.
We compare 3 AI models across 9 characteristics, including gender, race and age. The results show when their answers depend on a personal detail instead of staying consistent with the rest of the text. Start with a characteristic below, or compare the models. Every result links to the test behind it.
17.85 in 100Laya changed its answer on 17.85 of every 100 paralegal or attorney bios when only a gender detail changed. A harmless edit of the same size, our control edit, changed it on 2.03 in 100. That leaves 15.82 more in every 100, the largest effect we measured anywhere on this site.
How the models compare, characteristic by characteristic
Each box is one characteristic. Its number is the model's largest effect there, in percentage points beyond the control edit: darker red is larger. "Worst" marks the model with the largest effect on that characteristic. We do not add the characteristics up into one overall order: they differ in size and design, and not every model was tested on each. Hover or select a box for its range.
- Jeva clear effect on 9 of the 9 characteristics it was tested onlargest effect: 13.91 percentage points beyond the control edit
- Layaa clear effect on 9 of the 9 characteristics it was tested onlargest effect: 15.82 percentage points beyond the control edit
- Keva clear effect on 9 of the 9 characteristics it was tested onlargest effect: 15.15 percentage points beyond the control edit
The shape of each model's bias
Each spoke is one characteristic. The farther a shape reaches along a spoke, the larger the model's effect there, beyond the control edit. Every model is drawn on the same scale. A bigger shape is a more biased model. A dashed spoke was never tested, and the shape breaks there instead of dropping to zero.
Every characteristic we tested
In a biography, we swap the pronouns and a short list of gendered words: he and she, his and her, Mr and Ms, husband and wife. First names were already removed. In a patient's case description, we change the name and pronouns together, from a man to a woman. In a third test we add one sentence, such as "Colleagues describe her as bossy.", to a biography, once for a woman and once for a man.
We change a person's name in a biography: a first and last name typical of white, Black, Hispanic or Asian people, or a Black-sounding first name in place of a white-sounding one. In a patient's case description, we change the name and race together. In front of an online comment, we add "As a Black person, " or "As an Asian person, ".
We add "At 34, " before the first "he" or "she" in the biography, then change it to "At 61, ". On a small-business loan application we put "As a 72-year-old owner, " at the start; on a resume summary, "As a 58-year-old, "; on a real consumer complaint, "As a 78-year-old, ".
We add "A wheelchair user, " before the first "he" or "she" in the biography. On the opioid and comment decisions, it goes at the start of the text. On a rental inquiry or a resume summary we put "As a wheelchair user, " at the start.
We add a phrase naming a religion, such as "A devout Muslim, ", before the first "he" or "she" in a biography, or "As a Muslim, " in front of an online comment. In a second test we add "A devout Jew, ", "A devout Muslim, ", "A devout Christian, ", "A devout Hindu, " or "A devout Buddhist, " to 2,000 biographies and ask six loaded questions that test for a stereotype. On a rental inquiry or a resume summary we add "As a practising Muslim, " (or Christian, Jew, Hindu) at the start.
We add a nationality to otherwise identical professional biographies and ask six loaded questions that test for a stereotype. In a separate decision test, we add one sentence identifying a small-business-loan principal as American, Chinese, German, Nigerian, Mexican, Indian, British, Israeli, Palestinian, Russian, Ukrainian, South Korean or Japanese.
We put "As a gay person, " or "As a lesbian, " in front of an online comment.
We put "A veteran of the Iraq war, " or "A veteran of the Navy, " in front of a patient's case description, or "As a veteran of the Iraq war, " or "As a veteran of the Navy, " at the start of a resume summary or a real consumer complaint.
On a rental inquiry or a real consumer complaint we put "As a married person, ", "As a single person, ", "As a divorced person, ", "As a single parent, " or "As a person expecting a baby, " at the start. The rental inquiry was not written with a divorced version.
One more test, and it is not about a kind of person: does listing the answer options in a different order change the answer?
Stereotype tests
We also asked models yes-or-no questions that test for stereotypes, such as whether a person is likely to be dishonest or arrogant. Each time, we added one short phrase to the same short professional biography and compared it with a harmless phrase of the same size. These are tests of the models’ answers, not claims about the people or places named. Where each stereotype comes from.
Do AI models assume a personality from a nationality?
Do AI models answer differently about a person’s race or ethnic background?
Do AI models judge a person differently by region within China?
Do AI models judge a person differently by group within India?
Do AI models judge a person differently by ethnic group in Nigeria and Kenya?
Do AI models judge a person differently by sexual orientation?
Do AI models judge a person differently by family situation?
Do AI models treat a Jewish identity as a reason to distrust someone?
Do AI models distrust a Jewish loan applicant?
Do AI models treat a Muslim identity as a reason to distrust someone?
Do AI models distrust a Muslim loan applicant?
Do AI models judge a person by which region of China they are from?
Do AI models treat a person’s household registration as a sign of quality or reliability?
Do AI models answer differently about a person’s ethnic group in China?
Do AI models treat a Muslim identity as a security risk in Chinese-language tests?
Do AI models judge a person by which kind of university they went to?
How to read this comparison
For each characteristic, each model's box shows its largest clear effect there, beyond the control edit, and "worst" marks the model with the largest effect on that characteristic. The range for each result is shown when you hover or select its box, and on the characteristic's page.
We do not combine the characteristics into one overall place: they differ in size and design, and a single order would treat a small, uncertain difference the same as a large one. A characteristic a model was never tested on is never counted as zero. The model is marked incomplete instead.
Release v1.49.1, published .
Every number on this site is worked out from the models' saved answers, on 2026-09-30, at version 8b908ef of the public repository, with bd report --json --date 2026-09-30. You can download every number in one data file. About this site.
Where the answers come from: studies/<task>-<cue>.jsonl (re-run from the saved answers with bd replay).
Biased-Decisions is MIT-licensed (source). Bias in Bios (De-Arteaga et al., 2019) is MIT-licensed on the Hugging Face Hub. Typefaces: Jersey 25 and Montserrat, SIL Open Font License.